Talk:Board/2014 Nominations: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(spammed with bad pictures. not good. I deleted)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[User:Gregorydillon|Gregorydillon]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 14:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC) Thank you for the Nomination to the Board.   I care about the Noisebridge community and space, and try to do the right thing by it.  If I ran, my platform would be to try to be an agent to bridge across some of the divides that separate the Noisebridge community, my theme would be to bring wisdom rather than smarts.
== (Nominations are closed. Removing declined nominees.) ==




[[File:WeeklyMeeting.jpg]]
The declined nominees were removed.  


 
How does this work that those nominated who neither declined or accepted continue to be on the nomination list now that the period is closed?
This is a good occasion to express my deep appreciation for the officers who take the job of Treasure and Secretary, because it looks like a lot of hours, and a good amount of tasks t[[WeeklyMeeting.jpg]]hat are of the "not fun" work nature.  Thank you Tom and Danny for your work, and all the candidates for the positions.
 
Again, thank you for a nomination, but for this year, it would be better if someone else is chosen.

Latest revision as of 21:43, 5 February 2014

(Nominations are closed. Removing declined nominees.)[edit source]

The declined nominees were removed.

How does this work that those nominated who neither declined or accepted continue to be on the nomination list now that the period is closed?