Conflict Resolution

Noisebridge has One Rule: Be Excellent To Each Other. This page is about how to practice Excellence when conflicts happen - and they will. Choosing the right response is itself an act of Excellence. The wrong response can make things worse for everyone. MAINTAINERS: CommunityWorkingGroup

⭐ Why This Matters

Not all conflicts are the same. A disagreement about how to organize the electronics bench is fundamentally different from an ongoing pattern of harassment. The same intervention that resolves one can make the other worse.

Excellence isn't just about being nice - it's about being effective. Understanding where a conflict sits on the escalation ladder helps us choose the response that actually leads to resolution, not the response that feels righteous in the moment.

📋 Quick Reference: Conflict Resolution Tools

Tool	When to Use	The Excellent Response
Direct Conversation	Most conflicts - hurt feelings, disagreements, friction	Use scripts below / Restorative Communication
Ask To Disengage	Conversation is escalating in the moment	Both parties step away, direct conversation later
Mediation	Direct conversation didn't work, both parties want resolution	Engage in good faith with mediator
Ask To Leave	Someone is making people feel unsafe right now	Leave without argument, sort it out later
Documentation	Pattern of behavior, may need community action	Path_to_86
86	Serious/repeated harm, community decision	Respect the community's decision

🚦 The Three Phases of Conflict

Based on Friedrich Glasl's model of conflict escalation:

🟢 Phase 1: Win-Win (Stages 1-3)

Both parties can still walk away satisfied. There are hurt feelings and possibly complex reactions, but self-resolution is possible. Mediation works well here.

Most conflicts at Noisebridge are here. The Excellent response is direct conversation using Restorative Communication.

🟡 Phase 2: Win-Lose (Stages 4-6)

Conflict now threatens individuals' standing and reputation in the community. One party "winning" now requires the other to "lose." Coalition-building, reputation attacks, and threats emerge. Mediation becomes difficult and potentially harmful. Structural interventions needed. Any mediation attempted must successful defuse these conflict escalations back down to WIN-WIN levels to have any hope of a successful mediation.

Become familiar with the conflict escalation tactics named in the Glasl Model.

Watch for Policy Injection and Consensus Spoofing - specific anarchist trust manipulation patterns that push conflicts into this phase. If you believe this is happening to you, please first ask carefully around the community to find out whether the person in question has the backing of something written or culturally articulated.

CAUTION: All of these patterns require careful sensitivity to identify. Accusing someone of one of these tactics when they're genuinely articulating something real will be seen as a manipulation tactic in itself. If you suspect these patterns apply to your situation, bring this up with a skilled mediator. Do not post in a public channel, this will cause conflict escalation by adding an audience.

🔴 Phase 3: Lose-Lose (Stages 7-9)

Parties will accept harm to themselves if it means harming the other more. Rationality is gone. Mediation is contraindicated. Only protective action works - AskToLeave, 86, or external authority.

At this stage, Excellence means protecting the community and supporting targets of harm.

For detailed descriptions of all nine stages, see Conflict Escalation.

🟢 Most Conflicts: Handle Directly

💚 Most conflicts at Noisebridge can be resolved without any formal process - and resolving them directly IS the Excellent thing to do.

The vast majority of friction between community members is Stage 1-3: misunderstandings, hurt feelings, different expectations, someone having a bad day. These situations are normal and fixable through direct human connection using Restorative Communication.

You do not need mediation, meetings, or community involvement for most conflicts. In fact, invoking process for a Stage 1-3 conflict often escalates it to Stage 4+ - which is decidedly not Excellent.

🧠 A Note for Neurodivergent Community Members

Direct confrontation is hard for many people - especially those of us who are neurodivergent, have trauma histories, or experience social anxiety. The instinct to avoid direct conversation and instead reach for "process" is understandable.

But hiding behind process doesn't protect you - it escalates the conflict.

When you:

• Post in Discord instead of talking to someone directly
• Ask a mediator to intervene in something that could be a simple conversation
• Bring something to a Tuesday meeting that's really between two people
• Frame a personal hurt as a "community safety issue"

...you're taking a Stage 1-2 conflict and pushing it to Stage 4. Now there are sides. Now there's an audience. Now someone might lose face publicly. The process you reached for to feel safe has made the situation less safe for everyone.

We know this is hard. That's why this page includes scripts you can literally copy-paste. Being Excellent doesn't mean being comfortable - it means doing the thing that actually helps.

🤫 When to Handle It Privately (No Process Needed)

These are ALL situations where the Excellent response is a direct conversation:

• Someone said something that hurt your feelings
• Someone's using a shared resource in a way you don't like
• Someone didn't clean up after themselves
• Someone's project is taking up space you wanted to use
• Someone was rude or dismissive to you
• Someone didn't respond to your message
• Someone disagreed with you in a discussion
• Someone's communication style rubs you the wrong way
• Someone forgot to do something they said they'd do
• Someone made a decision about shared space without asking you
• You feel excluded from a project or conversation
• Someone criticized your work
• Someone seems to be avoiding you
• You had an awkward interaction and don't know where you stand

None of these require mediation. None require posting in Discord. None require bringing up at a meeting. The Excellent path is talking to the person directly.

💬 How to Be Excellent: Conversation Scripts

If direct confrontation feels overwhelming, here are templates based on Restorative Communication principles. You can literally copy these. Using them is being Excellent.

For hurt feelings:

"Hey, I wanted to talk about something. When [specific thing happened], I felt [feeling]. I'm not saying you did anything wrong - I just wanted to let you know how it landed with me. Can we talk about it?"

For space/resource conflicts:

"Hey, I noticed [situation]. I was hoping to [what you wanted]. Is there a way we can work this out?"

For awkward situations:

"I feel like things have been a bit weird between us lately. I'm not sure if I did something or if I'm imagining it. Can we clear the air?"

For when you're not ready to talk yet:

"I'm feeling some friction about [thing] but I'm not ready to talk about it yet. I just wanted you to know I'm processing. I'll come to you when I'm ready."

For when someone's behavior is bothering you:

"Can I give you some feedback? When you [specific behavior], it [impact on you]. I'd appreciate it if you could [specific request]."

You can send these via text, Discord DM, email, or in person. Private communication is almost always more Excellent than public communication for Stage 1-3 conflicts.

⚠️ Why Process Escalates Instead of Helping

When you invoke process for a Stage 1-3 conflict:

• You create an audience - Now there are witnesses. Stakes go up.
• You force public positions - People entrench to avoid looking bad.
• You signal distrust - The other person may feel accused.
• You create a record - What could have been forgotten is now documented.
• You recruit implicit allies - The people you tell become your "side." (This is how Consensus Spoofing begins.)
• You make backing down harder - Public admission of fault feels like losing.

A 5-minute private conversation could have resolved it. Now it's a Thing. That's not Excellent for anyone.

💪 Remember: Everyone Here is a Volunteer

No one at Noisebridge is paid. No one owes you their labor - especially not their emotional labor.

When you escalate a conflict that could have been handled privately, you are demanding emotional labor from the people around you:

• The friends you vent to
• The community members who now have to "pick sides"
• The mediators who have to spend hours helping you work through something a 5-minute conversation could have resolved

Mediation is not a free service. It is time-consuming, emotionally draining work done by volunteers who have other things they could be doing with their time at Noisebridge. When you ask for mediation, you are asking someone to give you a significant gift of their energy.

If you repeatedly escalate conflicts that could have been resolved privately - if you keep demanding community labor for problems you could solve yourself - you will lose goodwill. People will stop wanting to help you. People will stop wanting to be around you. Your reputation in the community will suffer.

The Excellent thing to do is to handle what you can handle yourself, and save the asks for when you genuinely need help.

🆘 When You Need More Help

✋ Ask To Disengage

If a conversation is escalating in the moment - voices rising, emotions running hot - anyone can ask to disengage. This isn't about who's right; it's about creating space before things get worse.

"I need to step away from this conversation right now."

The Excellent response when asked to disengage is to disengage. Take a break. Come back to it later when you're calmer. Refusing to disengage when asked is not Excellent.

🤝 Mediation

If you've tried to talk directly and it's not working, a mediator can help facilitate the conversation. Mediators are community members who've volunteered to help.

⚠️ Not all conflicts are appropriate for mediation.

Mediation works for early-stage conflicts where both parties want resolution. Once a conflict escalates into personal attacks, coalitions, threats, or ongoing harassment, mediation can actually make things worse - it delays protective action and can force targets to repeatedly engage with people who've harmed them.

See Conflict Escalation to understand when mediation helps vs. when it becomes harmful.

🚪 AskToLeave

If someone's behavior is making people feel unsafe right now, anyone can ask them to leave the space. This is a temporary measure to create safety, not a punishment.

The Excellent response when asked to leave is to leave without argument. The situation can be sorted out later. Refusing to leave, or making a scene about it, is not Excellent - it escalates the situation and harms everyone present.

🚫 86 - Permanent Ban

For serious or repeated harm, the community may decide someone is no longer welcome at Noisebridge. This is not taken lightly. See Path_to_86 for how this process works.

Sometimes Excellence means protecting the community from people who refuse to be Excellent themselves.

📢 Reporting and Support

📝 If You Need to Report Something

• Email: secretary@noisebridge.net (or contact a mediator directly)
• Anonymous reporting: https://safespace.noisebridge.net/

💙 Getting Support

If you're not sure what to do, or you're afraid to approach someone directly, you can:

• Ask someone you trust to come with you
• Ask someone to talk to the person on your behalf
• Contact a mediator for advice (even if you don't want formal mediation)

Asking for help is Excellent. You don't have to figure this out alone.

🔗 See Also

• Excellence - The One Rule
• Conflict Escalation - Detailed breakdown of all nine stages and when each intervention works
• Bravespace - The #bravespace Discord channel for discussing community dynamics
• Restorative Communication - Communication framework for having difficult conversations
• Mediation - The mediation process and current mediators
• Ask To Disengage - De-escalating in the moment
• AskToLeave - Temporary removal from space
• Path_to_86 - How permanent bans happen
• 86 - The ban list
• Policy Injection - Fabricated rules as manipulation
• Consensus Spoofing - Fabricated agreement as manipulation
• Process Weaponization - Using legitimate processes as weapons