Talk:86: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→revrend mik: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
peeps should try to date entries (i wonder if there's a way to do that automatically?). Example, one entry says "recently"-- who knows when "recently" was? | peeps should try to date entries (i wonder if there's a way to do that automatically?). Example, one entry says "recently"-- who knows when "recently" was? | ||
== | == reverend mik == | ||
stop delting my edits!!!! everybody knows hes not allowed back and hes spreading a bunch of garbage about noisebrigde! why am i the only one who cares about this???? | stop delting my edits!!!! everybody knows hes not allowed back and hes spreading a bunch of garbage about noisebrigde! why am i the only one who cares about this???? | ||
Hello previous poster. This is the Streisand Effect. If you call attention to the Reverend Mik entity disparaging Noisebridge... you have let him win. He's not hanging around the space anymore, why bother recognizing him? | |||
Revision as of 12:33, 9 December 2014
peeps should try to date entries (i wonder if there's a way to do that automatically?). Example, one entry says "recently"-- who knows when "recently" was?
reverend mik
stop delting my edits!!!! everybody knows hes not allowed back and hes spreading a bunch of garbage about noisebrigde! why am i the only one who cares about this????
Hello previous poster. This is the Streisand Effect. If you call attention to the Reverend Mik entity disparaging Noisebridge... you have let him win. He's not hanging around the space anymore, why bother recognizing him?