|
|
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| | Author of this Record [[User:User|User]] | | | Author of this Record [[User:User|User]] |
|
| |
|
| |-
| |
| | December 10th, 2024
| |
| | proposed by Elan
| |
| |City Committee '24
| |
| | "Noisebridge hereby consenses to pre-approve spending up to $20k to bring the building into ADA compliance. Expected costs are ~$15k with $10k reimbursed by city grants.
| |
| Expenditures for this venture will be managed/approved by a committee composed of: Elan, Loren, Mark Julius"
| |
| |Author of this record: Mark
| |
| |-
| |
| |November 26th, 2024
| |
| |Guy (Rugyoga)
| |
| |Buying a nice 3D printer
| |
| |Consensing to fund the 3d print guild to purchase a Qidi Max 3 at the black Friday price of $700 + tax and shipping. (<nowiki>https://qidi3d.com/products/qidi-x-max-3</nowiki>). It would enable prints of kinds that are currently impossible on the existing printers.
| |
| |Author of this record: Mark
| |
| |-
| |
| | September 5th, 2023
| |
| | proposed by [[User:Mwillson|Mark]]
| |
| | 2 member block -- for only freeform motions -- temporary 3 month effect, renew
| |
| | Renewing May 23rd, 2023 Consensus Item
| |
| REVIEW AGAIN on AUGUST 27th, 2024
| |
|
| |
| Updating blocking requirement for big C consensus items from 1 to 2 people. Currently in order to block a big C consensus Item, we need only 1 member to block. Would like to update this number to 2 members. Perhaps the 1 member to block made sense when the community was tiny. It doesn't make sense anymore in our much larger community. If you cant convince anyone else to block with you, then maybe you just have bad ideas. The community should not have to make changes only folks with bad ideas think are good.
| |
|
| |
| This change would be provisional for 3 months [from May 23, 2023]. Also would only apply for member proposed consensus items, non-member proposed consensus items would still be block able by a single member. Also only 1 member would be required to block new membership. Also if any one member would like to block, but cannot because they are alone, they can request a 1 week hold to defer decision for an additional 3rd week.
| |
| |Author of this record: [[User:Mwillson|Mark]]
| |
| |-
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| !
| |
| !
| |
| !
| |
| !
| |
| !
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| <!-- open consensus item with meeting discussion for over two weeks, no blocks, rolling back to draft for further illumination
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | February 16th, MMXXI
| |
| | Ⅹ
| |
| | Be excellent to each other.
| |
| | Fiscal Sponsorship for noisebridge.space project & Party == ON
| |
| | ɲ
| |
| | Author of this Record [[User:User|User]]
| |
| -->
| |
|
| |
|
| | } |
| |} | | |} |
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
You might be looking for
- Use the Draft Consensus Items page if your consensus item is still drafty, in need of much revision, or not something that you think people already can more or less agree with, rather than this page. This page is intended for discussion.
- Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
}
| Date First Discussed XX Month, Year
|
Proposed By User
|
Informal Summary Title
|
Body of Motion
|
Author of this Record User
|