Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions
Update consensus |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |||
| First discussed: NOT YET | |||
| Dana | |||
| CONSENSUS TO RESTRUCTURE OUR MEETINGS | |||
| | |||
Noisebridge meetings regularly carry on for hours, to a point where community members are unable to stay until their items of concern come up for discussion. Our meetings can feel draining, dysfunctional, and frustrating. We must improve our meeting structure and moderation culture so Noisebridge can have healthier meetings, and so we can grow our community. | |||
Summary: Set 1 hour meeting goal. 1 meeting per month geared towards new folks. Other monthly meetings we get right to business. Active moderation, limits on discussion time and scope. Encouragement to make agenda items available before a meeting. | |||
Full proposal is here: https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Noisebridge_Meeting_Restructure_Proposal | |||
| Dana | |||
|- | |||
|- | |- | ||
| First discussed: February 21,2023 | | First discussed: February 21,2023 | ||
Revision as of 14:17, 2 April 2023
| Noisebridge | About | Visit | 272 | Manual | Contact | Guilds | Stuff | Events | Projects | Meetings | Donate | E |
| Meetings (c) [Prev · Next T] | Templates: Process (1st/mo) -- Discussion (non-1st/mo) | Current Consensus: edit -- History | Archive | Metaguild Archive | Announcements | Facilitation | Note-taking | V · T · E |
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
Is your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with? Perhaps it belongs on the Draft Consensus Items page, instead?
The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
| Date First Discussed XX Month, Year | Proposed By User | Informal Title | Summary | Author of this Record User |
| First discussed: NOT YET | Dana | CONSENSUS TO RESTRUCTURE OUR MEETINGS |
Noisebridge meetings regularly carry on for hours, to a point where community members are unable to stay until their items of concern come up for discussion. Our meetings can feel draining, dysfunctional, and frustrating. We must improve our meeting structure and moderation culture so Noisebridge can have healthier meetings, and so we can grow our community. Summary: Set 1 hour meeting goal. 1 meeting per month geared towards new folks. Other monthly meetings we get right to business. Active moderation, limits on discussion time and scope. Encouragement to make agenda items available before a meeting. Full proposal is here: https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Noisebridge_Meeting_Restructure_Proposal |
Dana |
| First discussed: February 21,2023 | Mark | CONSENSUS OR DEMONSTRATED EFFORT TO FIND A GOOD LOVING HOME FOR EXPENSIVE EQUIPMENT BEFORE WASTE DISPOSAL |
Expensive equipment should go through the 2 week big-c consensus process or have a demonstrated good-faith effort made to find a good loving home for it before it is gotten rid of through waste disposal. An example might be a piece of equipment worth over $20,000 USD when it was new. This is both out of respect and to save the reputation of Noisebridge for future donation of expensive equipment... Something something a reasonable publicly documented effort to reach project/tool owner must be established so as to comply with this procedure. NOTE: This has been tabled from Feb 28 meeting in favor of private apology / accountability. |
Mark |