Current Consensus Items
| Noisebridge | About | Visit | 272 | Manual | Contact | Guilds | Stuff | Events | Projects | Meetings | Donate | E |
| Meetings (c) [Prev · Next T] | Templates: Process (1st/mo) -- Discussion (non-1st/mo) | Current Consensus: edit -- History | Archive | Metaguild Archive | Announcements | Facilitation | Note-taking | V · T · E |
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
You might be looking for
- Use the Draft Consensus Items page if your consensus item is still drafty, in need of much revision, or not something that you think people already can more or less agree with, rather than this page. This page is intended for discussion.
- Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
| Date First Discussed XX Month, Year | Proposed By User | Informal Summary Title | Body of Motion | Author of this Record User
|
| September 5th, 2023 | proposed by Loren | 2 member block -- for only freeform motions -- temporary 3 month effect, renew | Renewing May 23rd, 2023 Consensus Item
REVIEW AGAIN on Feb 18, 2025 Updating blocking requirement for big C consensus items from 1 to 2 people. Currently in order to block a big C consensus Item, we need only 1 member to block. Would like to update this number to 2 members. Perhaps the 1 member to block made sense when the community was tiny. It doesn't make sense anymore in our much larger community. If you cant convince anyone else to block with you, then maybe you just have bad ideas. The community should not have to make changes only folks with bad ideas think are good. This change would be provisional for 3 months [from May 23, 2023]. Also would only apply for member proposed consensus items, non-member proposed consensus items would still be block able by a single member. Also only 1 member would be required to block new membership. Also if any one member would like to block, but cannot because they are alone, they can request a 1 week hold to defer decision for an additional 3rd week. |
Author of this record: Mark |
| Some time in December | Proposed by Elle | Guild's right to Refuse | To make abundently clear that the guild that organizes the use of an item, such as sewing for sewing machines and electronics for arduinos, and gaming for game related controllers, can refuse, dispose of or return to donor donations made to them. If the guild deterimnes an item is not safe for Noisebridge, the guild's determination will be given greater weight than the donor or others who do not or are not trained in the use of the item donated. | Author of this record: Elle |